Friday, November 16, 2012

"A Christian Faith Enriched by Buddhism"

In a Huffington Post article, Susan J. Stabile writes:

"But for Buddhism, I could not be Catholic today. When I left Catholicism my sense of independence and self-sufficiency was too strong to accommodate a personal relationship with, or recognition of my dependence on, God. Buddhism's individuality was much more consonant with my self-image, and Buddhism offered me a means of developing a spirituality that facilitated my eventual return to God."

Read the rest of the article here. 

Stabile is the author of Growing in Love and Wisdom: Tibetan Buddhist Sources for Christian Meditation.



Sunday, November 4, 2012

Catholic Priest Openly Supports Same-Sex Marriage

Photo by Doug Kasputin, Baltimore Sun
From Stoyan Zaimov's article in The Christian Post:

"A Roman Catholic priest in Maryland, one of the states that will be deciding whether to approve of same-sex marriage on Nov. 6 [2012]*, has told his congregation that he will continue to support such unions – right after reading out loud a letter from his Archbishop urging Catholics to vote against gay marriage. 

     'Could we not then say that their devotion to and support of each other . . . could be recognized by the church as a valid sacrament of God's unrelenting faithfulness to us just as much as the union of an elderly straight couple? Neither will procreate children, but both can be sacraments of God's faithfulness in the living out of their commitment to each other,' the Rev. Richard T. Lawrence told his congregation at Baltimore's St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church on Sunday."...

click here to read the rest of the article.

Fr. Lawrence's argument is similar to the one made by Andrew Sullivan in "What You Do," a 1996 New Republic essay. As Sullivan explains, the Catholic church's hierarchy asserts that the sexual act must have two core elements: a "procreative" element (the willingness to be open to the creation of new life) and a "unitive" element (the desire to affirm a loving, faithful union). However, the church also expresses compassion for the infertile and the elderly by allowing them to marry even though they cannot produce children. Sullivan maintains that the church should also extend its compassion to gays and lesbians by offering them the sacrament of marriage: 

Andrew Sullivan
"Sterile couples are allowed to marry in the church and to have sex; so are couples in which the wife is post-menopausal. It's understood that such people have no choice in the matter; they may indeed long to have unitive and procreative sex; and to have children. They are just tragically unable, as the Church sees it, to experience the joy of a procreative married life. 
     The question, of course, is: Why doesn't this apply to homosexuals? In official teaching, the Church has conceded that . . . homosexuals 'are definitively such because of some kind of innate instinct or pathological constitution judged to be incurable.' They may want, with all the will in the world, to have a unitive and procreative relationship; they can even intend to be straight. But they can't and they aren't. So why aren't they allowed to express their love as humanely as they possibly can, along with the infertile and the elderly?"

I personally disagree with the church's official definition of homosexuality as an "objective disorder." (Also, adoption and other avenues can enable a gay marriage to be procreative!) But I really love how Sullivan uses the hierarchy's own logic to undermine its stance on same-sex marriage. And I deeply admire Fr. Lawrence for sticking his neck out like that to defend same-sex unions -- and to express dissenting opinion within the church.


*Maryland voters approved the gay-marriage measure in the 2012 election.


Friday, November 2, 2012

A Dead Voudou Queen Led Me Back to Jesus

In my early thirties, after more than two decades of rejecting all organized religion, I found myself hungry for something I could not name. So I began seeking sustenance, and several years of reading, yearning, solitary exploring, and spiritual experimentation slowly brought me back to my Catholic roots and eventually into a Christ-lit contemplative journey.

There were circuitous twists and turns and wildly graced moments before that homecoming. I share one such moment here, in celebration of All Soul's Day.

It was early summer, 1994. After several years of graduate school and teaching college-level writing, I was depressed, burned out, and numb. The semester that had just ended had been exceptionally rough. I had received a few heart-breakingly horrible student evaluations at a time when it was taking every ounce of my energy to teach. Also--through dreams and through personal introspection--I had been hit with some deeply disquieting insights. The most disturbing of them was: I do not know how to love. Although I could put on a fairly good act of seeming concerned and engaged, interiorly I was exhausted and deeply thirsty. I harbored bitterness toward my students for not liking me and for not learning from me. I felt put-upon by friends who appeared to need something from me that I could not give. Everything and everyone seemed to be sucking my energy away, and my contracted little self felt utterly incapable of reaching out to others to give or receive genuine loving-kindness.   

Perhaps, I thought, I do not know what love really is.

At the time, my spiritual explorations had me dabbling in paganism and Voudou. Gathering magical ingredients, constructing small altars, preparing candles, and being attentive to the phases of the moon for ceremonial purposes had become a creative outlet for me. The rituals that I discovered in various local botanicas and psychic shops were tasty spiritual recipes; I was cooking, stirring it up, concocting potent cleanses and delectable spells. True: my educated, rational side remained fairly skeptical about the effectiveness of these rituals. But at the very least, I figured, they helped to focus intention and to approach projects and life events with conscious preparation and a sense of reverence.

Not a heavy-handed reverence, though. My skepticism allowed a light touch, a playfulness within the serious seeker’s hike I was on. These rituals initially served as a kind of lived performance art for me -- an expression of yearnings I was unable to articulate in any other way. My body, with the help of the earth and the cosmos and the motions prescribed in the rituals, was engaging in a dance of prayer, though that was not the phrase I typically used to describe my activities at the time.

I was particularly taken with the work of Luisah Teisch, a storyteller, teacher, and priestess of the goddess Oshun in the Yoruba Lucumi tradition. Teisch is the author of Jambalaya, a book of African-American wisdom, memoir, and Voudou-informed practices that a friend had given to me as a gift.

Undoubtedly, my Catholic upbringing had imprinted me with a taste for ritual, but in 1994 I was still avoiding anything having to do with mainstream religion. Teisch’s book was full of advice on altar-making, down-home spells, and candle work that appealed to me. It was also written with care, offered as an introduction to a rich blend of African wisdom, goddess spirituality, and Catholic ritual that had received little attention from religion-and-spirituality book publishers. I loved Teisch’s unashamed declaration that “Voudou has been mislabeled, misunderstood, and exploited …. Let the truth be known: Voudou is a science of the oppressed, a repository of womanknowledge.

Delicious stew for my beaten-down soul, this Jambalaya.

Right after that horrific spring ‘94 teaching semester, I had to attend a family reunion across the country in South Carolina. Greyhound buses were offering a $68 summer special to travel anywhere in the U.S.A. So I decided to ride the Hound from southern California to South Carolina and back again, stopping for a few days in New Orleans. Roughly: a 6000 mile pilgrimage, by bus and on foot.

I wanted to go to New Orleans because there is a special ritual, described in Teisch’s Jambalaya, that requires a visit to the tomb of Marie LaVeau, the famous multiracial Voudou queen (and visitor-of-prisoners-and-the-sick church lady) of the Crescent City. The ritual enables one to address the spirit of Mam’zelle Marie and ask for her assistance. My crazy, unspoken hope was that a visit to her tomb would help me find a way out of the drought and disquiet that had settled into my life.

One week before my excursion, when the phase of the moon and the planetary hours were just right, I spent an entire night cleaning, blessing, and dressing (with sacred oils) special colored candles I had acquired at a local botanica. I felt like the timing of my trip was auspicious because a comet, a seed of the cosmos, would soon be colliding with Jupiter – the planet that represents expansion. I lit the candles for seven nights and invoked Yemaya, the Yoruba ocean goddess (and giver of fertility), asking her for a successful journey and a fruitful visit to Marie’s tomb.

I managed to rent a room in the French Quarter, just a few blocks from the St. Louis Cemetery, where Marie’s tomb is located. In her instructions for the tomb ritual, Teisch suggested wearing light clothing and a white gele or headdress. “If you’ve been sick, or feel a little frightened, you may further protect yourself by pressing a white carnation (bottom side down) to the center of your scalp beneath the headdress.” I spent my entire first day walking around New Orleans searching for a white gele and carnation. I found neither, but my wandering led to great opportunities to savor beignets, gumbo, and street-corner jazz.

The day of the ritual started out balmy and sultry, with a definite potential for thunderstorms. The atmosphere seemed laced at the edges with danger. What if there is lightning? What if I can’t find Marie’s tomb? Might I end up lost in a cemetery as a tornado approaches? Since I had found no gele or carnation, I would have to settle for my off-white floppy hat at as headdress. Remaining determined, I gathered the items I would need for meeting the spirit of Marie: seven dimes, an ankh around my neck, and my prayer, which I had written down on a small piece of paper.

“As you approach the gate of St. Louis Cemetery #1,” explains Teisch, “knock three times with your left hand, scrape the soles of your shoes on the banquette outside of the gate, and ask, ‘St. Peter, St. Peter, please let me in.’”

I did so, feeling a little foolish and thankful that no one was around. I also added, for good measure, a little prayer to the Mother that I had come across at the Voodoo Museum:

Shield me, keep me,
Dispel my fear.
Save me, shield me,
Be ever near.

“If you feel the response is no, step back and leave. If yes, step forward over the threshold, stop on the other side of it, and turn to your left. Walk down the aisle to the first available right turning and take it. You are now in front of Mamzelle’s tomb.”

I did not feel a response either way, so I just kept following the instructions. Marie’s tomb – above ground as all are in New Orleans – was broken down and seemed to need tending, but it was also decorated with wilting flowers, red beads, and various offerings: a tiny crown of thorns, a little glass-encased cake decorated with a white face and red eyes, slivers of wood with purple ribbons attached, pennies, and pieces of red brick.

I walked around and bowed at each the four corners of her disheveled grave. Then, with my back facing the front of the tomb, I extended my arms first to the sky, then to the ground, while praying aloud for Marie’s assistance. I asked her to help me find a way to be of service to the world – especially to lead me to a way that would benefit a few of my sad and lonely female friends, since there seemed to be nothing within me capable of being genuinely helpful or loving to them. I asked Marie to open the eyes of my thirsty soul, to make me sensitive, to deepen my intuition. I prayed for healing, guidance, and balance.

The instructions continued: “Return to the front of the tomb, face it, press your forehead against it, and place seven silver dimes in the basket attached to its front.”

There was no basket, so I simply laid the dimes out on a shallow ledge of the tomb.

“You will find several pieces of red brick lying on the ground. Pick one up and make your X on the spot of your choice.”

I drew my X, noticing that it was one among hundreds of X’s, some bright, some fading.

“Say thank you. Wait. Listen for a message.”

I stood there for a while, waiting and listening and sweating – it was probably 100 degrees, seriously humid, with thunderheads gathering above. I had a disposable camera with me and snapped a few pictures of the tomb. At that moment a pale, bedraggled, and seemingly homeless man appeared. He smiled at me and I saw that his upper gums were bleeding. “I hear that she especially appreciates tobacco,” he said as he placed a cigarette behind a piece of red brick. His presence was somewhat unnerving; I had thought I was the only living soul around. Was his appearance part of Marie’s "message?" I reached into my bag to get my pack of Newports, and left Marie yet another cigarette, this time one with menthol. Bleeding Gums then mentioned that he had just noticed another tomb was being built and that the artistry was amazing. Sure enough, in the near distance three men were pouring cement for a fresh tomb. I was beginning to get the heebee-jeebees.

If this were a dream, I mused, I might think that new tomb was for me . . .

Instead of cutting a hasty exit, as instinct would have me do, I ended up wandering around the cemetery for a little while, perusing the headstone inscriptions and statues of angels and saints. I was still waiting to hear a “message,” and began to wonder if I had unwittingly bungled things by taking photos inside a sacred burial ground, when I was supposed to be there to perform a brief ritual. Maybe Marie did not appreciate such a thing? I decided to walk by Marie’s tomb one more time – perhaps I should apologize for my clumsiness and lack of reverence.

Once again facing the crumbling grave, I noticed that my cigarette and seven dimes were gone! Everything else was still intact – several pennies, and the other cigarette that Bleeding Gums had left. Only my offerings were gone. Was this some kind of sign? Or had Bleeding Gums simply scooped up my seventy cents and menthol cigarette? And if he had, might that have some kind of hidden meaning? Was he something other than he appeared to be? Was Marie trying to tell me that she had accepted my offerings and heard my prayers?

Troubled, bemused, and sweltering, I decided it was time to go. “When you leave you should knock again (preferably with the right hand), scrape your feet and ask St. Peter to let you out,” Teish writes. “If you felt sad or scared while performing this ritual, it is advisable that you knock, ask, then step backward over the threshold.”

I thanked Mam’zelle and walked out backwards over the threshold. At that instant, the bells for a noontime Mass started ringing. There was a Catholic church right across the street from the cemetery – the International Shrine of St.Jude (the saint of the desperate and of lost causes). I hadn’t been in a church in maybe fifteen or twenty years. Something urged me to step inside.




The Mass was being held in a small, humble, interior chapel – not the main sanctuary of the church. It was a weekday so there were just a few people, mostly older black women, in attendance. I also noticed a couple of Mohawk-sporting punk rockers and some tourists. A youngish black woman wearing a black skirt, white tights and black shoes sat in front of me. Her nails were polished black, and her headscarf had the words “Grim Reaper” printed on it in red. Poking out from under her scarf were yellow hair rollers. She turned out to be the cantor and the lector – the person who reads the scriptures and sings the responsorial psalms as part of the liturgy. I loved this; she was definitely from the Voudou side of the street. The priest was a very young, bearded white kid with a gold earring in one ear. He wore jeans with black tennis shoes under his robes. He seemed new at the job and nervous, which was quite endearing.


Masses that I had attended as a child were frequently formal and stiff. So to see punk rockers with blue-haired old ladies, a funky cantor sporting a grim reaper scarf, and a young, nervous priest totally disarmed me. Everything seemed so improbable, in terms of the mixture of folks gathered there to worship, yet also so down-home, so grits-and-catfish, so unassumingly hospitable.

Still, I sat near the back and surveyed everything, attempting to maintain a tourist persona: I’m just going to sit here and watch the “natives,” I thought. And then the opening hymn, carried mostly by the crackly voiced and slightly out-of-tune older women, began. It was “Amazing Grace.”

Suddenly and strangely, I was flooded with emotion. Tears sprang to my eyes, and it is usually impossible for me to cry in front of strangers. A gate opened within me even as I struggled to keep the tears from reaching spill-point—a protective skill that I had practiced for much of my life. It was to no avail. The tears ran down my face. I bowed my head and wiped them away, hoping to remain unnoticed. I had forgotten all my childhood Catholic training, when to sit and stand and kneel, when to say amen and thanks be to God. I did not really hear the lector’s scripture readings, nor can I recall anything about the priest’s homily. All I was able to do was sit with this rush of emotion. Deep and dry interior spaces in my soul had opened up to receive an unnamable flow that was pouring into me with waterfall force. I also felt, obliquely and mysteriously, that I was being welcomed home after a long time away. Recognizing myself as the long-lost prodigal child, in a flash of gratitude I understood that everything and everyone I had encountered that day – Mam’zelle Marie, Bleeding Gums, the grave workers, the bones lying in the tombs, the punk rockers, the grim-reaper cantor, the blue-haired old women, the earringed priest, the thunderheads – each and all was in some hidden sense a family member welcoming me home. Here I was: fully home on Earth, a daughter of the human family, alive and afloat in a wild unfolding universe.

In my mind a recognition flowered: This is the Holy Spirit introducing me to the mystical body of Christ.

That particular summer bus journey and the ritual at Marie’s tomb, followed by the mass and my first Holy Communion (I’d never received the Eucharist as a child), shifted the trajectory of my life. I think of it as my moment of conversion – the moment when my heart opened to receive a flow of mysterious nourishment from a loving Source outside of myself. Love, I saw, could not be conjured up by a striving, half-formed ego attempting to sport compassion and kindness like some eye-catching garb. Love was not of my own making, nor could it be created through any mixture of herbs and oils and timed candle-lightings. Love, though “within,” originates outside of small-self me. Up until that day, I had lived my adult life as though I was responsible for manufacturing love and compassion on my own steam. In effect, I was living in a very small, self-focused world, a world largely closed to God, to the source of Love, to the wide river of Being itself. This unexpected moment of conversion entailed an opening up to this mysterious Source, this unbounded Vastness that is also – somehow -- intimate and cradling. 

Nothing was ever the same after that; there was no going back, no returning to the mindset I had previously occupied.

Now, I know what some folks will say about this event: that I had set myself up with all the rituals and prayers to Yemaya, the journey to NOLA to ask for Marie's intercession and guidance – isn’t Voudou really just another variant of Catholicism, anyway? A more subversive strand of it that would appeal to a confused and moderately depressed creative-writing grad student, a bridge back to the tradition that had been imprinted into my consciousness early on? Wasn’t there just a deep part of me that simply wanted to reconcile with this tradition – and all those experiments with paganism and Jambalaya provided the means to do so?

And I’d have to say: Yes – that’s entirely possible. Probable, even.

But here is another way that my soul, on this All Soul’s Day, likes to tell that story: I was lost, adrift in a dry land far from home. My heart cried out, and my cries were heard. Messages and wisdom from the ancestors arrived through friends and books and storytellers. I was given instructions on how to proceed: Visit the tomb of one of our saints, Marie LaVeau, an ancestor who knows what you need. Using rituals to help temper my skepticism, I approached her with reverence and with sincerity. And she, Marie, a beautiful echo of Mary, the God-Bearer, took me by the hand and led me to a temple built in honor of lost causes. There, in the midst of elders and rebels and hospitable strangers, I was found. Fed at the great banquet. And welcomed home.

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Monday, October 29, 2012

Ranty Ramblings of a Roamin' Catholic


Okay -- this is what I had really wanted to write a while back, before when I went off on a spiel how great the Catholic church (and many other Christian churches) can be.

The plain truth is: church is also frustrating and maddening. I’m not even talking about the abuses, hypocrisies, and sundry other crazinesses that litter its history and its current manifestations. There is also just the day-by-day balancing beam of praying and loving and serving with people who may or may not be on the same wavelength. And also, the variety of approaches to dealing with, challenging, and/or ducking dastardly dictates from on high.

Here’s just one example of this: There are two midlife women in my Engaging Spirituality group who are married to each other. I’ll call them Dierdre and Molly. They got hitched during the brief window of time when same-sex marriage was legal in our state of residence, but they have been living in commitment to each other for more than twenty years. Dierdre was raised Catholic and has always felt most deeply at home spiritually in Catholic churches. And, to a certain extent, the institutional church welcomes her. The Holy See considers homosexual orientation to be “objectively disordered” – neither a choice nor a sin. They see it as a kind of congenital condition, I guess? – somewhat akin to a disability. So, according to the Vatican, it is "okay" to be gay – just as long as one doesn’t act on his or her orientation and have a lover / spouse of the same sex. In essence (and despite a lot of disagreement on this in the pews) Catholic gays and lesbians are supposed to be celibate, as is a straight Catholic who is not living within the sacrament of marriage. 

While Molly was not raised in a particular religious tradition, she became Catholic as an adult after being drawn to the church through her relationship with Dierdre. The pastor at our church -- who has long known about their relationship – welcomes them and accepts their civil marriage. While he cannot officially bless their couplehood, the two are welcome to receive communion. This would not be the case in some Catholic churches, where many priests would say that “living in sin” or being “outside of the state of grace” bars them from receiving communion. (And there are some bishops – Newark Archbishop John Meyers, for example -- who are demanding that gay-marriage-supporting Catholics in their dioceses stop taking communion. More lines being drawn in more sand. But despair not. Check out this Huff Po article by Rev. Daniel C. Storrs.)

Molly’s connection to the Catholic church has always been uneasy. Though grateful for our pastor’s support and for the acceptance and love of several Catholic friends and co-parishioners, she and Dierdre are still partially closeted in church. Even in our fairly liberal parish, there are still certain folks who would find their relationship unacceptable. Molly describes it as a kind of liturgical “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. She and Dierdre can go to church together, but they must avoid expressions of affection that other couples take for granted. In introductions among church friends and acquaintances, they cannot refer to each other as wife -- at least not until they feel comfortable enough to let their hair down. And part of this tip-toeing concern is for our pastor, who could get in trouble if our bishop got word that married lesbians receive the Eucharist in his church.

Over the past year, Molly grew increasingly weary of this church closet. It’s difficult enough to live with the day-to-day intolerances of the larger U.S. society – having to be closeted in the space that is supposed to be a spiritual home grated harshly against her sense of integrity, decency, and self-respect. So she started attending a nearby Episcopal church, where her marriage to Dierdre could be shared openly, among all the congregants.  So far, her wife Dierdre has stuck with the Catholic church – attending Mass on Saturday afternoons but also joining Molly at the Episcopal liturgies on Sunday. We joke with Dierdre that she is going to become really holy, attending two churches each weekend.

Recently Molly invited our ES group and several other friends to attend a ceremony celebrating her reception into the Episcopal church. She radiated such joy that day – new suit, new highlights in her hair – standing next to her wife without having to hide or dance with duplicity.  The Molly contingent (most of us Catholic, including at least 3 nuns) filled about a third of the medium-sized chapel, part of a simple and elegantly-designed space comprised of several units inside an industrial park.

The bishop of the local Episcopal diocese – a warmly sincere, slightly goofy, and welcoming fellow -- was the presider. Beyond Molly’s elation, what I remember most about this day was the open discussion that occurred at the end of the service, when the bishop invited those gathered to ask questions or voice a concern.

One of the questions we explored was the role that today's worshipping communities play in a culture that frequently sees religion as working at cross-purposes to secularism, democracy, and reason. As the bishop explained, the three top adjectives that non-church-goers use to describe those in the pews are: judgmental, hypocritical, and homophobic. Nearly everyone sighed sadly and shook their heads, recognizing the truth in these descriptors – even though it’s not the complete truth. One woman in her 80s shared her experience of how she grew out of her judgments and fears about homosexuality after her daughter came out to her. Now, with the two of them reconciled and attending the same open and affirming church, she has great hope for an evolving Christianity.

Another person asked if the bishop believed in hell. I felt him treading carefully here, a high-level religious leader in a mixed crowd of children and adults. Chuckling, he began by saying “well, hmm … sometimes this stuff ends up on the internet.” (So of course, this kindly man remains incognito in this-here pseudonymous blog, and a part of me can’t help but wonder if Christianity is evolving all that much if even an Episcopal bishop has to be this cautious about what he says…). But I loved his response, which took the form of a thoughtful rhetorical question: “If you go to ‘heaven,’ and yet others are in ‘hell,’ – can you really be in heaven?”

And the bishop ended up admitting that he believed truth was revealed in all the major religions, and that he disagreed with the claim that Jesus is the “one and only way” to be saved/transformed/heavenbound: “Is Jesus a way or the way? I find that he is the way for me, but to say that he must be the way for all is perilous.”

Really, just a delightful part of the celebration, this informal pre-barbecue chat with the bishop. And so here I go again, jabbering on about the wonders of church, when I had intended at least somewhat of a rant about how crazy and wearisome Christian worshipping communities can be. Alas, perhaps I’m an Episcopalian in Catholic drag -- not that there's anything wrong with that -- and the dissonance keeps throwing my aim off. 



Friday, October 12, 2012

Check it Out: More Heretic Catholics!

Hey all you Roman Catholics out there who watched the October 11 debate between Joe Biden and Paul Ryan, both "active Catholics": Did you notice that neither candidate agrees with the Vatican's position on abortion? The Church's official stance is that human life is "sacred and inviolable" from conception until natural death and that Christians must never "intentionally kill, or collude in the killing of, any innocent human life, no matter how broken, unformed, disabled, or desperate that live may seem." In the eyes of the hierarchy, this basically means no abortions in any circumstances. [Tangential comment: the Church actually does allow a rare exception to this rule. There is a procedure referred to as an "indirect abortion" -- which occurs when the primary goal is to save the mother's life and involves no intentional killing of an embryo or fetus. Such a situation might arise when a pregnant woman has malignant uterine cancer and must have her uterus removed, resulting in the unintentional death of the fetus].    

Paul Ryan defines himself as "pro-life" (I always put those words in quotes because it's used as a manipulative buzz-phrase. I mean -- come on, who isn't "for life?" For more commentary, check out this post). However, he would allow for exceptions in the case of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother. This is not in alignment with Church doctrine, which values unborn life no matter the circumstances of conception. (The Church has also canonized Gianna Beretta Molla, a woman who refused to have an abortion when she was pregnant with her fourth child, even though she knew that continuing the pregnancy would likely kill her...)


Joe Biden says that he personally accepts the Church's stance on abortion, but does not feel that one religion's views should be imposed on a diverse population -- acknowledging that others, even devout Christians and other religious practitioners, hold differing views on abortion. During the debate, he stated "I do not believe that we have a right to tell other people -- women -- that they cannot control their body. It's a decision between them and their doctor, in my view." This also contradicts the Church's position. The Vatican has maintained that politicians should not separate their personal and political views -- that U.S. public servants who are Catholic must take an anti-choice stance and do what they can to overturn Roe v. Wade. 


I'm more in agreement with Biden on this issue, of course. But also, I'm just appreciating that the U.S. public got to see two different Catholic opinions on abortion  -- and opinions which both disagreed with official Church doctrine. Catholic heretics are not just the non-practicing and so-called "fallen-away" folks. Catholic heretics are active: in the pews, on church pastoral boards, serving in missions, teaching in  universities, debating as politicians -- with widely varying opinions, challenging (and being challenged by) the Vatican, disagreeing with each other -- and yet still walking together, even if stumblingly... And learning, and stretching out, rooted in an inexplicable wild love -- even when we can't feel it, even when it's hidden from us.


Hear our crazy, bumbling, malarkey-filled prayers.